neeroc (neeroc) wrote,
neeroc
neeroc

Karla Homolka

The judges in Quebec really need to stop smoking crack. How is it that a repeat sex offender, who lied to the Crown to make a deal and get a lighter sentence, is able to walk away with absolutely no restrictions, when there is a section of the Criminal Code that allows for these restrictions to be set up? She is responsible for the rape of at least 5 girls, and the murder of 3, including her own sister. And yet now there is nothing to restrict her from contacting her victims or their families?

If nothing else, she is claiming some sort of Stockholm Syndrome defense now, so why would they not restrict her communications with her ex-husband? This judge believes there is a chance she will re-offend (which is what section 810 is about) but decides to lift all restrictions. It leaves me shaking my head.
Subscribe

  • Good news! Bye-bye old house

    In case you missed me cartwheeling around Twitter and Facebook earlier today, we've finally sold our house. Lest I lose my status as a supreme…

  • Well then.

    It appears I've been neglecting LJ. Turns out I have a pretty good reason. (No not *that* reason - that would be FAN-FREAKING-TASTIC and the post…

  • Every single moment

    I woke up early Sunday morning to the pitter-patter of little feet followed by a plea to be helped into bed. I pulled her up and she quickly snuggled…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 4 comments