?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Oct. 21st, 2006 @ 08:56 am What?
While I was listening to the radio on the drive home from work yesterday, a heard two on-air personalities discussing the 'fact' that OJ Simpson was writing a new book, tentatively titled 'If I Did It', apparently detailing his supposed crime in gory detail. This disturbed me enough that I decided to look into it when I got home. A quick Google search unearthed this MSNBC site which cites its source as The National Enquirer. The NE site has this article linked off the front page.

Not once during the 2 to 3 minutes that this was discussed on the radio was this publication cited as the reference. As soon as I saw the MSNBC article it invalidated the facts of the issue for me. I know this isn't a news station, but to me there is still an important difference between, 'OJ is writing a book' and 'the National Enquirer reports OJ is writing a book'! and it angred me that they hadn't made that distinction.

But why should it? Are the writers at The NE more or less likely to thoroughly check these types of stories before publishing them? Am I unjustly biased against this publication due to its associates such as the Weekly World News? Is it the tone of the article and the overall reporting that is a problem? Is it a lack of source identification?

How often are they wrong? How often have they been wrong about OJ? And finally, how disgusting is this book idea?
Who does she think she is?
kiss a dementor
[User Picture Icon]
From:jennygel7
Date:October 21st, 2006 07:34 pm (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
It's a sick and disgusting thought to think that he is playing on the public's (still real) suspicions "If he did it..." and then capitalizing on his former wife's death for pure monetary gain.

OJ Simpson is the very definition of human garbage.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture Icon]
From:neeroc
Date:October 23rd, 2006 12:26 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
Agreed. I am so happy we have the not profitting from crime laws. Sensationalism like that I can live without.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture Icon]
From:tarheel_born
Date:October 21st, 2006 08:43 pm (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
I heard about this book and think it's truly disgusting. Apparently the murder scenes are very very graphic. I hope no one buys his book and he gets blasted for it.

He seems to think that people have forgiven him or that it's something along the lines of Hugh Grant's indiscretion. I don't know if OJ said that or the blog I read said that but one guy had an indiscretion in a car with a 'professional' and one killed the mother of his children. Worlds apart.

I also wonder if he'll have to sign over the advance as part of the civil case.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture Icon]
From:neeroc
Date:October 23rd, 2006 12:27 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
I also wonder if he'll have to sign over the advance as part of the civil case.

Ohhh! That's a really good point! He still owes tonnes doesn't he?

And what the hell does this do to his kids?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)